Dr Andrew Iles stated in a letter to my GP on July 17th, (in a letter discharging me behind my back the day I was in hospital due to a crisis, which I had no knowledge of at the time, and a letter which I didn't know about until much later when I saw my records and which didn't safely hand me over to another long-term psychiatrist's care) that:
“I have sought peer review of the above, as well as advice from my defence union, to assure that my plans and decisions are safe, reasonable and fair.”
Since he tells my GP that both he and his defence Union (MDDUS) are happy with what he has done on all fronts, I wonder why MDDUS are now telling us he is unhappy with this being detailed online?
He was clearly happy with what he was doing, and tells us MDDUS had validated his plans, strange that everyone is now unhappy about these 'plans and decisions' which were validated as' safe, reasonable and fair' being online?
Commentaires